FacebookTwitterGoogle+WhatsAppGoogle GmailShare

Definition of False Flag“False flag terrorism” occurs when elements within a government stage a secret operation whereby government forces pretend to be a targeted enemy while attacking their own forces or people.The attack is then falsely blamed on the enemy in order to justify going to war against that enemy. Or asWikipedia defines it:


False flag operations arecovert operationsconducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as if they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time; for example, during Italy’sstrategy of tension.
What about the U.S.?

Is it logical to assume that, even if other countries have carried out false flag operations (especially horrible regimes such as, say, the Nazis or Stalin), the U.S. has never done so? Well, as documented by theNew York Times,Iranians working for the C.I.A.in the 1950′s posed as Communists and staged bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected president (see alsothis essay).

And, as confirmed by a former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and theformer head of Italian counterintelligence, NATOcarried out terror bombingsin Italy with the help of the Pentagon and CIA and blamed communists in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. Asone participantin this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security.”

Moreover,declassified U.S. Government documentsshow that in the 1960s, the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan code-named Operation Northwoods to blow up American airplanes(using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. The operation was not carried out only because the Kennedy administration refused to implement these Pentagon plans.

For lots more on the astonishing Operation Northwoods, see theABC news report;the official declassified documents; and watchthis interviewwith James Bamford, the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News Tonight with Peter Jennings.One quote from the the declassified Northwoods documents states: “A ‘Remember the Maine’ incident could be arranged: We could blow up a US ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba. Casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.”

What about Al-Qaeda?

You might think Al-Qaeda is different. It is very powerful, organized, and out to get us, right?Consider thisLos Angeles Timesarticle, reviewing a BBC documentary entitledThe Power of Nightmares, which shows that the threat from Al Qaeda has been vastly overblown(and seethis articleon who is behind the hype). And formerNational Security AdviserZbigniew Brzezinski testified to the Senate that the war on terror is “a mythical historical narrative.”
And did you know that the FBI hadpenetrated the cellwhich carried out the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, but had at the last minute cancelled the plan to have its FBI infiltrator substitute fake powder for real explosives, against the infiltrator’s strong wishes? See alsothis TV news report.

Have you heard that the CIA is alleged to havemet with Bin Ladentwo months before 9/11? Did you know that years after 9/11 the FBI first stated thatit did not have sufficient evidenceto prosecute Bin Laden for 9/11? (See alsothis partial confirmation by theWashington Post) And did you see the statement inNewsweekby the CIA commander in charge of the capture thatthe U.S.letBin Laden escapefrom Afghanistan?

Have you heard that the anthrax attacks which were sent along with notes purportedly written by Islamic terrorists used a weaponized anthrax strain from thetop U.S. bioweapons facility? Indeed,top bioweapons expertshave stated that the anthrax attack may have been a CIA test “gone wrong.” For more on this, seethis articleby a former NSA and naval intelligence officer andthis statementby a distinguished law professor and bioterror expert (andthis one).

It is also interesting that the only Congress members mailed anthrax letterswere key Democrats, and that the attacks occurred one week before passage of the freedom-curtailing PATRIOT Act, which seems to have scared them and the rest of Congress into passing that act without even reading it. And though it may be a coincidence, White House staffbegan taking the anti-anthrax medicinebefore the Anthrax attacks occurred.

Even General William Odom,former directorof the National Security Agency, said “By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In 78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism, yet in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation” (the audio ishere).

Why Does This Matter?

Please read what the following highly respected people are saying:

Former prominent Republican U.S. Congressman and CIA official Bob Barr stated that the U.S. is close tobecoming a totalitarian societyand that elements in government are using fear to try to bring this about.

Republican U.S. Congressman Ron Paul stated that the government “is determined to have martial law.” He also said a contrived “Gulf of Tonkin-type incidentmay occur to gain popular support for an attack on Iran.”Former National Security Adviser Brzezinski told the Senate that a terrorist act might be carried out in the U.S. andfalsely blamed on Iranto justify yet another war.

The former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan administration,Paul Craig Roberts, who is called the “Father of Reaganomics” and is a former editor and columnist for theWall Street Journal,BusinessWeek, and Scripps Howard News Service,has said:


“Ask yourself: Would a government that has lied us into two wars and is working to lie us into an attack on Iran shrink from staging ‘terrorist’ attacks in order to remove opposition to its agenda?
 

Retired 27-year CIA analyst Ray McGovern, who prepared and presented Presidential Daily Briefs and served as a high-level analyst for several presidents, stated that if there wasanother major attackin the U.S., it would lead to martial law. He went on to say:


“We have to be careful, if somebody does this kind of provocation big violent explosions of some kind we have to not take the word of the masters there in Washington that this was some terrorist event because it could well be aprovocationallowing them, or seemingly to allow them to get what they want.”
 

The former CIA analyst would not put it past the government to “play fast and loose” with terror alerts and warnings and even terrorist events in order to rally people behind the flag.

General Tommy Franks stated that if another terrorist attack occurs in the United States “the Constitution will likely be discardedin favor of a military form of government.” Former UN Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter stated before the Iraq war started that there were no weapons of mass destruction. He is now saying that he would not rule outstaged government terrorby the U.S. government. And British Parliament Member George Galloway stated that “there is a very real danger” thatthe American government will stage a false flag terror attackin order to justify war against Iran and to gain complete control domestically.
The abundance of reliable information in this essay suggests that not only has the U.S. in the past conducted false flag operations, but there is a possibility that 9/11 involved some element of this deceit, and a future false flag operation cannot be ruled out.Let us spread this news to all who care so that we might build the critical mass necessary to stop these secret operations and work together for a more caring civil society.

The Identity Of Osama Bin Laden.

There have been countless threads implicating Bin Laden and the CIA.

We know from the Afghan war that the US supported the Mujahadeen. That is fact. Was he still on the payroll prior to 911? Well, that is what we are here to find out. The CIA met with him in July of 2001 a few months prior to the 911 attacks. They must have known something was up then.

Osama Bin CIA Agent

When Osama Bin Laden was ‘Tim Osman’

Same article as above, different source

Meeting Riconosciuto and Gunderson at the hotel were two representatives of the mujahadeen, waiting to discuss their armament needs. One of the two was named “Ralph Olberg.” The other one was called Tim Osman (or Ossman).“Ralph Olberg” was an American businesman who was leading the procurement of American weapons and technology on behalf of the Afghan rebels. He worked through the Afghan desk at the U.S. State Department, as well as through Senator Hubert Humphrey’s office. Olberg looked after the Afghanis through a curious front called MSH – Management Sciences for Health.

The other man, dressed in Docker’s clothing, was not a native Afghan any more than Olberg was. He was a 28-year-old Saudi. Tim Osman (Ossman) has recently become better known as Osama Bin Ladin. “Tim Osman” was the name assigned to him by the CIA for his tour of the U.S. and U.S. military bases, in search of political support and armaments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*